Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
South Asia Economic Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murshed, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notes

Globalization and South Asia: A Perspective

S. Mansoob Murshed

Institute of Social Studies (ISS), PO Box 29776, 2502 LT, The Hague, the Netherlands, Murshed{at}iss.nl

This article is about the contribution of increased international trade to the growth of international inequality and disparities between the developed and developing worlds. The central argument is that globalization in the nineteenth century created the present-day Third World, and contemporary globalization perpetuates this marginalization of the developing world. The difference lies in the fact that global disparities and inequities are far more transparent in our virtually uncensored information age. Throughout this article, I mainly refer to the ‘increased trade’ aspect of globalization, particularly the policy imperative to engineer increased trade, which is so keenly advocated by economic development specialists from both the North and the South. I also stress the hegemonistic and coercive aspect of globalization, which governs the asymmetric and unequal interaction between the North and the South. The processes of marginalization of the Third World during the two historical phases of globalization have certain striking historical similarities. I discuss mechanisms through which the growth of international trade may not promote convergence in incomes between North and South, utilizing in particular the new theories of international trade. I describe the nature of international inequality in our age of globalization. The article also traces the relative success of the South Asian region during the post-1980 period of rapid globalization. Finally, the article concludes by reviewing the backlash to globalization in our digital age, along with historical parallels.

South Asia Economic Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 311-326 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/139156140400500208


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?